A Critical Analysis Of The Painter English Literature Essay

A Critical summary Of The Painter English Literature EssayAshberys The Painter is a special(a) numbers, with many different layers of meaning to unwrap and unravel, and unmatched that tin cant exclusively be read with place approaching these aims of comprehension intimately too countermand to understand on any one layer. Even having studied it in depth I still feel like Ive b atomic number 18ly scratched the come on of this metrical composition, and I tend to think that this was an entirely deliberate act on the authors p ruse using take a leak, style and language to allow multiple interpretations of the meter a comment on record and tender-heartedity, a comment on the production of art or a comment on the worship of operatives.This verse is a narrative at first reading the plain written story of a lynx. Reading more deeply it could be perceived to be a satiric comment on the concept of art and the process of its creation he expected his subject to p make i ter of Paris its own portrait on the canvas1, or on the imagination of an artisan in calling the protagonist, who created art, a mountain lion2, whilst referencing at bottom artists angle from the buildings3yet with no indication that these artists produced any kind of art. Finally, the nautical language, wrecks4and painter5(the rope apply to attach a ship to the docks or land) could bakshish to an interpretation of the poem being a comment on personality reclaiming land that humanity stole.The poem is undramatised merely implies an omniscient third person vote counter who takes no part in the action, but reflects on it in spite of appearance. The wraith of this narrator is intellectual and neutral, with no indication that the narrator cares for the subject. This narrator does up to now manage to comment on the thoughts and feelings of the painter, he enjoyed he expected6indicating that the narrator is the voice of the author, as opposed to also being a fictitious c haracter within the poem. It could also be argued that the narrator symbolises God the omniscience and the references to requester within the poem lend to this interpretation. Just as children imagine a prayer is merely silence7indicates that the author believes prayer cannot be merely silence, and and so the narrator could be symbolising God, hearing the photo as a prayer.The formal structure of the poem is six-spot and a half stanzas. The six stanzas narrate his history, almost in the fashion of speech, using a dress circle of enjambment, and structured sentences to create the narrative atmosphere of the poem. The final half stanza is one sentence long, and ends suddenly, as though his subject had decided to remain a prayer8. The ending of this stanza is significant because the death of him is narrated in the first out ocellus of the last stanza, they tossed him, the portrait, from the tallest of the buildings9. The reader is left to decide whether him refers to the painter , or to the portrait is it personalisation of his work, or is it the death of the artist pre-empting the natural loss of art to nature. The penultimate line mentions the loss of his equipment, the sea devoured the canvas and the brush10, therefore seeming to rig these above the death of the painter or portrait in importance. The last line focuses back on the subject of nature, and the idea that the work would be left incomplete, much as the stanza was.On one of its levels, the poem is to the highest degree a painter struggling to paint nature, whilst succeeding in painting (wo)man, he chose his wife for a new subject11. The immediate battle visible in this is the idea of man trying to exert incorporate over nature and failing, and this is held up by the climax, where nature eventually wins. The level on which it could be read as a satire on the act of art, and role of an artist is the wordplay around painter and artist and the painter being the only one to produce art within th e poem. These themes and levels tie together however to suggest that the core of the poem is a comment on the role of art can art accurately reflect nature? Is it a task only for the elite or can anyone participates in its production? Can humans paint current art or only a human image of what art might be?In terms of time and place the poem appears to be set somewhere relatively modern the language utilise is part of the typical vernacular in England, and until the last stanza the language is used to create a relatively realistic scenario in which we do not have to suspend disbelief, and even then they tossed him, the portrait, from the highest of the buildings12isnt a statement that could be seen as fantastic, only as unlikely in todays culture.As far-off as I can tell, my social and cultural distance from the poem isnt that great, so I will probably be reading it quite an closely to the way in which the author wrote it theres nothing to indicate that the painter deviates fr om social norms or male stereotypes, except perhaps his submissive nature, in having been put to work by the other people in the building. I would say however that I have a distance from the poet, who is an of age(p) man, and that some of the themes within the poem might mature with age.The world adopt and ideology of the poem seems to be that nature is the pinnacle of art, and anything a human creates is secondary to that. It highlights the importance and value of the experience of a painter, but passes satirical comment on the idea of an artist the artists in this poem are never seen even to try and create. In that way it denigrates artists, saying that nature is a higher form of art, and that maybe its hubris to claim the identity of artist for oneself.To some extent, the poem evokes a sense of peace whilst in places the marrow is approaching violent, the form is quite gentle, and as a narrative poem the reader has some emotional distance from the story. It also leaves the r eader with a sense of questioning the real meaning of the poem what is it asking almost the nature of art?Written in a very sincere style, very little imagery is immediately visible apart from the coincidence of his wife to ruined buildings, a short simile. This is nonetheless very effective, almost summarising the overarching theme of the poem in one line, where the phrase ruined buildings13implies a taking back of buildings by nature, much like the images you see of trees bursting out of long abandoned houses. It could also be argued that the sea is a fiction for the concept of nature as a whole and the reclamation of military man and art by the sea as relating to nature reclaiming the world. The poem is typically quite direct however, and even the aforementioned simile is very simple, but the conflict of the painter and the sea is central to the meaning, the fact that whilst he can paint a vast14portrait of his wife, he is completely unavailing to paint nature, at least with any integrity.It might be that its unrealistic to answer that with relation to such a complex poem. It certainly uses structure, form and style effectively to create a questioning atmosphere within itself, in which the poem is very open to interpretation on the roles and interaction of human, art and nature, by the reader.