Argument Analysis: America’s Real Dream Team Essay

In Americas Real Dream team, publish in the New York Times on March 21, 2010, doubting doubting Thomas went to a big Washington party to attend the 2010 Intel Science Talent front finals. To his surprise, Most of the finalists who came from Ameri feces high school hailed from immigrant families, largely from Asia. Thomas decl atomic number 18s himself a pro-immigration fanatic. He points out keeping a constant flow of intelligent immigrants is the key to mark our country stronger. He also explained that the most(prenominal) distinguished economic competition is between people and their own imagination. And this new fancy give the axe be used to produce commodity at a very low price by all kinds of ways, and discharge take a shits peachy profits for economy. Thomas Friedman used parable, special list, precise utilisations, and a earnest tone to illustrate that it is possible to crop more than technological and sparing improvements through an open immigration policy . Thomas uses metaphors in the title to create boundless association. While using metaphors, it not only attracts readers attention but also make a foreshadowing for readers to consider active what is Americas real dream team? by and by reader thinking about the comparison, its more convenient for him to disentangle his own view in the argument. Dream team is a beginning to the U.S. basketball team assembled for the 1992 Olympic that contained the best players at that time.Thomas comp atomic number 18d the youth people who generate new ideas to dream team to imply that these preadolescent people will use the new ideas they sparked to create miracles and will plough the real dream team in the future. Metaphors here laughingstock make the abstract easier for readers to understand, additionally, it makes the language more vivid. In addition to metaphors, Thomas make use of a special statistics to make an obvious point most of the finalists atomic number 18 migrates. Usually , the writer will use statistics in this way at that place are 40 finalists in total and how many percent of them are migrates, but Thomas listed all the names of the Intel science talent finalist. In that way, while the readers reading the names of the finalists, they can easily found that these are foreigners names so that they can easily conclude that most of the finalists are immigrates, It gives the readers enough time to get it before he makes the conclusion. More accurately, he makes the conclusion with the reader together. It seems that he is communicating with the readers, and this can be more helpful for the readers to accept his argument.He then gave a specific example toconvince his thesis do not turn out the door to immigrate .From the statistics, the readers only know that most of the finalists are immigrates, but they do not know how outstanding exactly these immigrate are. Thomas gave us much(prenominal) an example Namrata Anand, a 17year-old girl. She is a so sm art student who can use spectral analysis proficiently to expose information about chemical history of Andromeda Galaxy. Obviously, Namrata is more outstanding than the fellow students. Thomas used this example to imply that if we shut our door to immigrates, we may loss lots of young people like her, which prove the essential of immigration. And it focuses on the theme again. Specific example here can make it easier to understand at the same time make it more persuasive. Thomas used quotes in various ways to express his view again. start of all, Thomas interviewed a biology teacher, Amanda Alonzo, a star teacher who had taught 2 of the finalists.Amanda told him it was resources provided by her school, extremely supportive parents and a grant from Intel that let her slide by part of each day inspiring and preparing students to enter his contest. Amanda is a prospered teacher, what she say is very persuasive to the readers, and Thomas quotes her words to demonstrate immigrate is a kind of good source. In the second place, Thomas quotes what spokeswoman verbalise wearyt sweat about the problems our generation will gravel to deal with. Believe me, our future is in good hand. As a representative of all finalists, what she said can represent what all finalists said adequately. And most of the finalists are immigrates, it proves that if we open the door to immigrates, we can get more excellent talents to solve the problems together. Besides, Thomas makes additions as big as we dont shut our door. to make it more persuasive as long as we keep a constant rate of immigrates, well be more competitive and we will surely dont need to fill about what we will be facing tomorrow. In a word, quotes here can provide the evidence for the argument. The author use a aboveboard tone to argue that we should keep our door open to the immigrates.Sincere tones can make the reader more comfortable. If Thomas write like we essential keep the door open to the immigrates ins tead, it will only let the readers aroma disgusted. And sincere tone shows that he give an advice sincerely, which can be more easily accepted by others. Thomas used metaphors, special statistics, specific examples, quotes and a sincere tone to announce that we can keep meliorate technology and theeconomy, as long as we dont shut our door to immigration. Metaphor make the language more vivid and metaphor in title can impress the readers more. Special statistics here can close to the readers and let the reader find the problems themselves. Specific examples here can make it easier for the readers to understand the thesis deeply, quotes can makes the language more condensed and a sincere tone can make it easier to accept the view. Thomas use them in combination to get his thesis step by step.