Reproductive Technology and Sexual Destiny :: Reproduction Homosexuality Essays

reproductive Technology and Sexual caboodleHomosexuality remains a disputable issue in our society, particularly regarding unfearings rights that argon generally readily apt(p) to heterosexuals, where the currently hotly debated issuance is legitimating the relationship with the sanction of marriage. Yet, numerous measures confirm been taken to eliminate light behavior through hormonal, biochemical, and anatomical interventions. heedless of the fact that such productive controls argon non yet getable in order to genetically engineer the sexual orientation of your churlren, timothy Murphy presents a discuss on the possibility of determining your childs sexual destiny. It puts forwards the question, Would it be incorruptly permissible for parents to genetically engineer their childs sexual orientation? Murphy maintains the moral stance that in that location are important freedoms that need to be keep regarding reproductive control and since we cannot unquestionably predict adverse effects on the interests of existing and future generations, he concludes that musical composition these techniques should be morally resisted, the expenditure of heterosexist interventions should not be criminalized. (343) This bind came at the heels of the 1980s, a time during which the amount of money of Disease Control sight an alarming rate of a exalted cancer, Kaposis Sarcoma, which they at counterbalance called gay cancer but soon renamed grid (Gay Related Immune Deficiency) among otherwise healthy gay custody since 1981. In fact, the term help did not come into use until 1982. Because the disease was first identified among gay men, AIDS was popularly considered a gay disease through the 1980s, although despite this misconception, as well as affected heterosexuals and children. Nonetheless, since it was still considered a gay disease, there was a authorized stigma attached to having it as many another(prenominal) claimed that AIDS to be idols pu nishment on transvestics. By the time Murphys article was published in 1990, there were 198,466 AIDS cases diagnosed in the U.S. while 121,255 people died.(1)Before presenting his arguments, Murphy provides a context of his discussion regarding the attitudes of gays and lesbians toward their sexuality. He cites the Bell & Weinberg studies that were published in 1978, which he refers to as the most all-encompassing study conducted on the lives of gay men and lesbians in any nation. These statistics are dated about 30 eld and therefore these attitudes may stick out changed. In addition, the statistics provided are skewed since individually group is not more or less represented in the study since it lone(prenominal) used 575 white transvestite males, 111 black homosexual males, 229 homosexual females, and precisely 64 black homosexual females.Reproductive Technology and Sexual Destiny Reproduction Homosexuality EssaysReproductive Technology and Sexual DestinyHomosexuality r emains a controversial issue in our society, especially regarding gays rights that are generally readily granted to heterosexuals, where the currently hotly debated topic is legitimating the relationship with the sanction of marriage. Yet, numerous measures have been taken to eliminate homosexual behavior through hormonal, biochemical, and anatomical interventions. Regardless of the fact that such reproductive controls are not yet available in order to genetically engineer the sexual orientation of your children, Timothy Murphy presents a discourse on the possibility of determining your childs sexual destiny. It puts forward the question, Would it be morally permissible for parents to genetically engineer their childs sexual orientation? Murphy maintains the moral stance that there are important freedoms that need to be preserved regarding reproductive control and since we cannot definitely predict adverse effects on the interests of existing and future generations, he concludes tha t while these techniques should be morally resisted, the use of heterosexist interventions should not be criminalized. (343) This article came at the heels of the 1980s, a time during which the Center of Disease Control noticed an alarming rate of a rare cancer, Kaposis Sarcoma, which they at first called gay cancer but soon renamed GRID (Gay Related Immune Deficiency) among otherwise healthy gay men since 1981. In fact, the term AIDS did not come into use until 1982. Because the disease was first identified among gay men, AIDS was popularly considered a gay disease through the 1980s, although despite this misconception, also affected heterosexuals and children. Nonetheless, since it was still considered a gay disease, there was a certain stigma attached to having it as many claimed that AIDS to be Gods punishment on homosexuals. By the time Murphys article was published in 1990, there were 198,466 AIDS cases diagnosed in the U.S. while 121,255 people died.(1)Before presenting his a rguments, Murphy provides a context of his discussion regarding the attitudes of gays and lesbians toward their sexuality. He cites the Bell & Weinberg studies that were published in 1978, which he refers to as the most comprehensive study conducted on the lives of gay men and lesbians in any nation. These statistics are dated about 30 years and therefore these attitudes may have changed. In addition, the statistics provided are skewed since each group is not fairly represented in the study since it only used 575 white homosexual males, 111 black homosexual males, 229 homosexual females, and only 64 black homosexual females.